gas to go up again today?

**sup-rbeast** · May 19th, 2008, 11:15 AM

If the war had stayed in Afghanistan where it belonged, we would be finished over there and still be able to afford fuel. But, some bonehead thought it would be wise to disrupt the flow of oil in one of our suppliers with a prolonged 5 year and counting war...So, yes, the Prez shoulders alot of the blame IMO...and don't even start on the dems...the GOP controlled congress when Bush got his war OK'd thorough deceit. BTW, most of the hijackers were Saudis...so do we invade there next BWC ?..that is your line of thinking on Iraq...you don't think the Saudis support terror?? More proof exists that they do than you could produce linking Iraq to terror a month or so ago.

**R13** · May 19th, 2008, 11:17 AM

Hasnt seen much proof that he did...Iran has and we knw it but we havent done [censored] there...Saddams been gone for how long now? and we are still over there getting ppl killed and wasting money....Say he supported them all you want but that was not the motivation for the war

**BlueWahooChambordDevil** · May 19th, 2008, 11:18 AM

disrupt the flow of oil?

you cant honestly tell me that you think that was the motive

if you believe that you are dumber than i thought

**sup-rbeast** · May 19th, 2008, 11:19 AM

It wasn't a motive..but a consequence none the less. If you want to see stupid, you need look no further than the mirror. When it comes to intellect, you can't carry my jock ol friend.

**BlueWahooChambordDevil** · May 19th, 2008, 11:23 AM

a consequence? ok fine.......but if you cant understand the justification behind it than you my friend are the one who is riding the intellectual short bus

**BlueWahooChambordDevil** · May 19th, 2008, 11:24 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Hasnt seen much proof that he did...Iran has and we knw it but we havent done [censored] there...Saddams been gone for how long now? and we are still over there getting ppl killed and wasting money....Say he supported them all you want but that was not the motivation for the war </div></div>
the motivation was to eliminate terrrorism and all the supporters or it

**R13** · May 19th, 2008, 11:26 AM

I think you must be talking about some other war i dont know about...when the war in Iraq qas started there was no talk at all about eliminating terrorism....thats his excuse now, not then

**sup-rbeast** · May 19th, 2008, 11:26 AM

Why don't you go ahead and justify it for us...and give us some reliable proof since that's what you always ask for...and by reliable I don't mean ultra conservative propaganda from lil ol conservative newsletters. BTW, Bush brought more terror to Iraq than Saddam ever did. Plus, do you really think that win or lose in Iraq, that terror is gonna be eradicated??? Hell no. A nuclear worldwide catastrophe couldn't eliminate terror from the globe...much less a War in Iraq. So, again, what was your point?

**1inStripes** · May 19th, 2008, 11:32 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think you must be talking about some other war i dont know about...when the war in Iraq qas started there was no talk at all about eliminating terrorism....thats his excuse now, not then </div></div>

We're not talking about Desert Storm, we're talking about Operation Iraqi Freedom. The pretense given was about the axis of evil and terrorism. Reps and Dems alike voted to do it.

**BlueWahooChambordDevil** · May 19th, 2008, 11:33 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: raider13</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think you must be talking about some other war i dont know about...when the war in Iraq qas started there was no talk at all about eliminating terrorism....thats his excuse now, not then </div></div>
thats not true at all it was said from the beginning that iraq had been a supporter of terrorism